PDA

View Full Version : SVA Results


AndyH
September 21st, 2007, 06:22 AM
Back from SVA... Better than I thought it could have been and certainly not the total in depth check that I though it would have been.

Issues are:-

"Eye" bolts for seat mountings need to show "8.8" strength.. By bad luck the face that has this stamped on them were all facing in... Big chap doing the test, and I don't think he fancied the wrestling match to get back in just one more time!! The Eye bolts have this mark, so Done

Bottom of dash not radiused to 19mm.... Foam to fix..A bit surprised at this.

Front indicator not 350mm from ground... Remove lense and paint inside to a line that is 350mm from the ground and then it'll be OK seemingly... no prob

Mirrors not capable of being held in position... This is a bit of a pain, but needs a strip (I need to break the mirror to do this!!) and some gunk to tighten the joint up. In hindsight, I knew about this... pain really.

Rear tyre does not display load index... Can get off the internet seemingly.

Contactable edge not radiused less than 2.5mm:-

1. Bonnet and boot catches.... rubber glued on will suffice
2. Side repeators... Fulvia teardrop type. I'll change these ones for a dome type unit...Just need to find one!!
3. Exhaust silencer and mountings.. Mounting will be a bit of rubber strip... Edge of exhaust not sure, but need a "U" channel to cover. Must be do able

Protect Battery +ve terminal (Plastic widget to cover up.)

Brake balance bar need to restrict travel... Need a nut with hole through this and the bar and roll pin to secure.. John H... I know you told me this, but I thought you needed to double nut it as well and I didn't have thread for this. Only needs one nut.
As a point of note... I put a couple of spacers on the balance bar in the inside of the cylinder push rods.. This limited the amount of adjustment I could make front to rear and helped with the brake test. This was never questioned and worked well.

N/S/Rear handbrake low effort.. This is the biggest question mark, but at worst I'll need to replace the caliper.

Speedo true speed in excess of speedo speed... Calibrate speedo (£50)

Rear Axle weight in excess of design weight... I need to write a letter to advise that the new design weight is 650Kg.

Pretty good really... No major gremlins. Rear view from interior mirror was OK, even with the rear louvre panel in place.. This I thought would be a problem.

Didn't check some of the detail that I thought... brake pipe fixing, seat mounting, "E" marking of wing mirrors... Maybe he did and I didn't notice.

Heh Ho... Feel a bit better today... Doen't appear to have used any water on travel there and back, so maybe it was just air in the system.

I'm even hopeful that the ticking is just an injector... A couple of them are louder than the rest.

For info, the side windows passed... The letter seemed to do the trick.. Further conversation required me to confirm that the side windows are Polycarbonate and not Perspex.. Polycarbonate is a recognised safety material. Gerry will oblige with a letter.

Andrew

Swamprat33
September 21st, 2007, 07:00 AM
Well done mate, nearly there.

I am suprised about the Fulvia side repeaters. Every replica I've seen uses them.

Tim

strat6v
September 21st, 2007, 07:05 AM
found that radius wasnt right myself. seem to have been ok everywhere else :confused:

John
September 21st, 2007, 09:34 AM
Further conversation required me to confirm that the side windows are Polycarbonate and not Perspex

But they are perspex, are they not? Perjury is not a crime where the SVA is concerned then ;) !!

AndyH
September 21st, 2007, 09:50 AM
But they are perspex, are they not? Perjury is not a crime where the SVA is concerned then ;) !!

I can only state what Gerry has agreed to do!

Not easy to tell apart unless you try to snap a bit off?

Andrew

Chris J
September 21st, 2007, 09:50 AM
Andrew

Make sure you get a copy of the document. when you get it.

They don't let you take the original. Sorry if you are already aware of this.

AndyH
September 21st, 2007, 10:01 AM
Andrew

Make sure you get a copy of the document. when you get it.

They don't let you take the original. Sorry if you are already aware of this.

Hi Chris, I wasn't aware of this... what exactly do you mean.?
When I went in today, I had a copy of the VOSA letter ref side windows, and the station took another copy.

Andrew

Chris J
September 21st, 2007, 10:55 AM
Andrew

It's whatever you get (or don't get to keep) when your car passes the SVA (the MAC ?).

It's taken off you when the car is registered, I've been told.

I understand that owners of previous SVA Stratos rep. passed cars have been able to copy or at least take a photo of this 'MAC' document.

I mention this because my car has nothing on paper, even though it has passed the SVA. The car wasn't mine when it was SVA tested you see? I'm the second owner.

AndyH
September 21st, 2007, 11:06 AM
Hi Chris,

I realised after the event that some of the docs that they use to record info did not get passed over. I'm going to try and get a copy when I go back in.

Cheers

Andrew

Chris J
September 24th, 2007, 12:36 AM
"Eye" bolts for seat mountings need to show "8.8" strength.. By bad luck the face that has this stamped on them were all facing in... Big chap doing the test, and I don't think he fancied the wrestling match to get back in just one more time!! The Eye bolts have this mark, so Done

The tensile strength marking of eye bolts is a new one on me, but I see they are available:

http://www.blitzworld.co.uk/images/eyebolt.jpg

Could do with a set of 8 to borrow from the club?

Another stupid SVA rule. As if you'd get eye bolts made of anything else?

Arthur
September 25th, 2007, 01:56 PM
Hmmm.

With me anorak on again, you'll only see the 8.8 mark on METRIC bolts and only if they are SAE standard.
They are also crap bolts - they are "1st level high tensile" and they get that way cos they are heat treated to get the strength, and they are also brittle. Chances are you're bolts are UNF anyway, which have different marks, and for good bolts should be DIN or Mil spec, with the threads cold-rolled on proper high strength alloy. See Tweaks or any good bolt stockist.

Arthur.

igosling
September 25th, 2007, 11:30 PM
Was reading the SVA rules last night (like you do!) and it actually specifies that the '8.8' markings do NOT have to be visible to the examiner. I'll send the exact quote when I get home tonight.

AndyH
September 26th, 2007, 12:08 AM
Hi,

The Eyebolts I have are standard UNF fittings from Europa Car Spares I think..

Each bolt has 8.8 shown on the side, and should satisfy the examiner OK.

Andrew

igosling
September 26th, 2007, 01:05 PM
Section 5, Point 4, Note 1

"A suitable single bolt fixing of adequate strength would be, for example, a bolt of at least 11mm (7/16") diameter of grade 8.8 (the grade may not be shown on a bolt produced for a seat belt anchorage)"

SVA is getting more scarey by the minute.

Mel Lewis
September 26th, 2007, 02:56 PM
:D :D :D its always best to humour the tester as to upset him will result in a much more indepth test. :D :D :D

mudhut
September 27th, 2007, 07:35 AM
Is that one of those "don't ask me how I know" things, Mel ;)