chris.richard
December 15th, 2002, 12:23 PM
I've put the engine back in again (bugger of a job single-handed), and I've a problem or two.
With the engine mounts in the right place (they were made by Hawk, and the measurements agree with those that some of you supplied) the drive shafts are 4.5cm further forward than the position recommended in the Hawk manual. The height is right, and the lateral position looks fine, but the driveshafts will be angled steeply backwards. There doesn't seem any scope to move the engine further back - I'm concerned there isn't room behind the exhaust manifold for the anti-roll bar as it is- and there would be no clearance from the engine against the removable transverse chassis member. (I'd love an extra 4.5cm of room for the alternator though - I had the auxilliary belt all sorted out of the car, but the alternator won't fit in the car. Back to the drawing board on that one.) The wishbone mounts on the chassis is slightly (about 1cm) further back than the dimensions given in the manual, but moving it forward wouldn't really help as it would increase the castor in the rear suspension, and the wheel would look strange that much further forward in the arch.
Is there a difference in the position of the driveshafts relative to the engine mountings between the 12v and the 24v? I would doubt it - aren't the block and gearbox the same?
Anybody any ideas, or is that the way the shafts sit with the Alfa engine in a Hawk? :confused:
It's fun trying to work out where to route the plumbing and the ancillaries. What seemed like a lot of space disappears once the lump is in and you put tanks, suspension, gearlinkages, exhaust, air inlets etc. in! I can see the advantage of a sloping bulkhead more clearly now. :rolleyes:
With the engine mounts in the right place (they were made by Hawk, and the measurements agree with those that some of you supplied) the drive shafts are 4.5cm further forward than the position recommended in the Hawk manual. The height is right, and the lateral position looks fine, but the driveshafts will be angled steeply backwards. There doesn't seem any scope to move the engine further back - I'm concerned there isn't room behind the exhaust manifold for the anti-roll bar as it is- and there would be no clearance from the engine against the removable transverse chassis member. (I'd love an extra 4.5cm of room for the alternator though - I had the auxilliary belt all sorted out of the car, but the alternator won't fit in the car. Back to the drawing board on that one.) The wishbone mounts on the chassis is slightly (about 1cm) further back than the dimensions given in the manual, but moving it forward wouldn't really help as it would increase the castor in the rear suspension, and the wheel would look strange that much further forward in the arch.
Is there a difference in the position of the driveshafts relative to the engine mountings between the 12v and the 24v? I would doubt it - aren't the block and gearbox the same?
Anybody any ideas, or is that the way the shafts sit with the Alfa engine in a Hawk? :confused:
It's fun trying to work out where to route the plumbing and the ancillaries. What seemed like a lot of space disappears once the lump is in and you put tanks, suspension, gearlinkages, exhaust, air inlets etc. in! I can see the advantage of a sloping bulkhead more clearly now. :rolleyes: